Search for: "D. I." Results 341 - 360 of 141,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2024, 9:10 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
If you have any specific topics or themes in mind that you’d like to explore in this style, feel free to share, and I can help you develop them further. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Id like to share my views on each of them, as well as a fifth: collaboration, which, I think, is the throughline that runs across many of the recent matters where the Commission has rewarded cooperation. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
For now, Id like to focus on one:  What counts as a proper primary reference under LKQ? [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
I'd have to look it up, cut and paste text, and puzzle for 5 minutes over the 3 layers of statutory law that got piled together for Trump. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 5:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
As I said at the outset, qui tam actions fit awkwardly with the standard D&O insurance policy language. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 9:29 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Id always want her to check in with me and to stay in touch, and it’s funny how we feel things, but right around 6:45 p.m. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Yuval Shany
Kevin Jon Heller, a special advisor to the Prosecutor, wrote on X: The complementarity section of this post by @yuvalshany1 and @amichaic is wrong, for reasons I explained in my post @opiniojuris. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 3:56 am by David M. Benenfeld
   “When this client came to me, I suspected that his injuries were worse than what he’d originally been told. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
He then purported to stay an opinion and a mandate of the Supreme Court of Arkansas for three months because he "believe[d] a need for restraint pending the Hearing [was] required before the influx of Lawyers Officers. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Concurrence: A perceptible ankle monitor strikes me as kind of shackle-y, so I'd be open to saying it's inherently prejudicial if it's actually perceptible to the jury. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:40 am by Daniel J. Gilman
I mean, I suppose you can call it a win with a lower-case small-font “w. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
This later judge “conclude[d] that the defendants in this case are not entitled to combatant immunity. [read post]