Search for: "DAVID BELL v. THE STATE"
Results 341 - 360
of 374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Bradley County Board of Educat Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 08a0586n.06 David Cox v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:22 pm
Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
" The Guardianship of Letha Bell Sullivan; Geneva Underwood v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
In Mason v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:13 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:25 pm
Bell Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0168p.062008/04/29 Gibson v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
" Bell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) David L. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:47 pm
The State of Indiana is appealing the decision ("Heath" is David L. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The New York Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for individuals with cerebral palsy within the State of New York. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25] Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26] Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
In 1996, David H. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Adviser 1***Morrison Foerster LLP, BELL ATLANTIC CORP. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
In Brenman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
In Brenman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Also in the Legal Times, Mauro has this article on the Court's 7-2 decision in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
