Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL"
Results 341 - 360
of 43,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 1:33 pm
In a recent appeal to the Divisional Court of Ontario’s Superior Court in Shete, Lada, and Chung v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:10 am
Even so, many cases have challenged, and will challenge, the notion of fair use and its extent, and a recent Federal Court decision looked at fair dealing yet again.The case of Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v York University dealt with with the distribution of study materials to students by York University in the form of Coursepacks. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
” Under Santobello v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 10:10 am
Remember Tiffany v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 12:11 pm
Later this month, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Watters v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
Simply stated, Lemley is wrong and his suggestion that eBay v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:30 am
The Ravenswood Investment Company LP v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:59 pm
Dowler and the firm [Howrey], alleging breach of fiduciary duty after an alleged deal to buy a patent for $1 million went sour.The case is Guardian Media Technologies Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:48 am
by Dennis Crouch The US Supreme Court recently decided SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:53 am
However, as the Texas Supreme Court noted in the case below, the insurer’s duty of good faith and fair dealing does not arise from the underlying contract – i.e. the insurance policy.In Viles v Security National Insurance Co., 788 S.W.2d 566 (Tex. 1990), the Texas Supreme Court dealt with a lawsuit revolving around the issue of whether the proof of loss was filed in a timely manner by the insured. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:31 pm
The concluding arguments in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:08 pm
The Court’s order sending the case of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:45 am
The Board minced no words in explaining the reduction: The main reason for that decrease is the fact that as a result of the decision of the Supreme Court in Alberta v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 3:44 pm
Thanks Ben, for asking me to share my thoughts on Conwell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:02 pm
State deals with whether, by running Barrow's two individual sentences consecutively, the trial court violated his constitutional right to a jury trial as set forth in Apprendi v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:37 am
My post references the three major fair dealing cases: CCH, SOCAN, and Access Copyright v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:37 am
My post references the three major fair dealing cases: CCH, SOCAN, and Access Copyright v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 4:01 pm
Over at The Race to the Bottom Blog, Jay Brown has posted a 3-part series reviewing Klaassen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] [read post]
