Search for: "DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 341 - 360
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
John Fund v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
Nothing in this Ordinance is intended to promote or condone the sale, distribution, possession or use of marijuana in violation of any applicable state or federal law. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
Nothing in this Ordinance is intended to promote or condone the sale, distribution, possession or use of marijuana in violation of any applicable state or federal law. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 12:35 pm
United States District Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:40 am
” In Adamsons v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Between the years 1973 and 2011, one hundred of nearly 2,000 Salmonella outbreaks in the United States were traced back to beef, leading to 3,684 illnesses.[1] Salmonella is omnipresent in feedlot cattle. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
v=uo35O1AJOfg [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:56 am
The United States of America was not founded to control. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
Apple was not successful in obtaining an injunction against distribution of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab in the United States, although the judge stated that Apple’s design patents might be infringed. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
” See FCC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
See Witkoff v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
Especially during this time of transition in relations between the U.S: and China there is much scholars can do to bridge the gap and foster solutions. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
See Cathedral Hill Tower v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
