Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 341 - 360
of 27,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
BackgroundThe case concerned an application to register a figurative trade mark in relation to Classes 9, 10, 18, 20, 25 and 28 of goods as identified in the Nice Agreement. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:00 pm
Ohio Measure 1 The track record for increases to judicial retirement ages in the last 20 years now stands as 4 wins to 3 losses as Ohio voters rejected Measure 1 Tuesday night. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Zak v Zak, 2021 ABQB 80 (CanLII) [20] It is trite law that the fact that a judge has found against a party does not constitute evidence of bias. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
So what exactly does this mean? [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:43 pm
So how does this help you keep your home? [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
John Doe and Jane Doe matter presided over by Mme Prothonotary Aronovitch concerning Teksavvy’s motion to be reimbursed by Voltage for its “reasonable costs in the event it had to release information” arising from Prothonotary Aalto’s order of February 20, 2014 which ordered that that:3. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 4:01 am
USCIS, Oct. 20, 2023 "U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:22 pm
Williams, Case No. 114310 - (1) Does the immunity conferred by the Emergency Medical Services Act, 210 ILCS 50/3.150(a), extend to the non-emergency transport of patients? [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:11 pm
(Proposition 30 resulted in a 0.25% state sales tax increase which does not apply to gas sales.)Source: Spidell's California Taxletter, Vol. 35.4, April 1, 2013. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
The German Federal Labor Court (judgment of March 20, 2018 – 1 ABR 15/17) has recently clarified a matter of considerable practical relevance for U.S. companies offering stock options to employees of their Germany-based subsidiaries: Does the German subsidiary’s works council have a right to be involved when it comes to offering stock options? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:20 am
§1324(a)(1)(iv) for any reason receives 5 years of imprisonment, because the jury found that Hansen had violated the law for financial gain, the court imposed the maximum sentence – 10 years for the “encouragement” counts, to run concurrently with a sentence of 20 years for the fraud counts. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
It does not change the meaning of the claim and it does not allow scope for any interpretation extending beyond the teaching of the application as filed. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am
Were the decisions in T 1024/1, T 2766/17, T 2293/18 and T 0121/20 to be the final nails in the coffin of a description amendment rethink? [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
This court has previously held that a solicitation to engage in sexual acts does not amount to a relationship as envisioned by AR 600-20 when the verbal advance was rejected. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
What if the return on that technology was $400:$1--for every $1 of government program money spent, the return in cost savings was $400? [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
[20] Id. at 37 [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 10:47 pm
[20] Id. at 37 [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
Does lack of co-parenting justify a modification of child custody in Virginia? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:16 am
There is growing consensus from recent Boards of Appeal that G1/21 does not endorse the imposition of ViCo oral proceedings, absent a state of general emergency (T 1501/20). [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:49 am
Previous Bites:Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: Bite #1 and Bite #2 (Bill of Rights, 1-6)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: Bite #3 (Bill of Rights, 7-12)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: #4 (Bill of Rights, 13-20)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: #5 (Bill of Rights, 21-30)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: #6 (Bill of Rights, 32-39)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites #7: Bill of Rights, 40-42)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: #8 (Bill of Rights,… [read post]
