Search for: "DOES 1 through 12"
Results 341 - 360
of 15,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm
Hayes, No. 12-0900/AF (not to be confused with United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
It’s true that at the core of commercial speech is speech that does no more than propose a commercial transaction. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 6:22 am
How Much Money From Survivor Benefits Does a Qualifying Child Receive? [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 5:52 pm
Evidence collected to date does not link all illnesses to this establishment. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 10:55 am
Jake, you help investors who have lost money through acts of fraud and other broker transgressions. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:44 am
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
A 53(c), second sentence, explicitly states that the exclusion provision does not apply to products for use in such methods. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:30 pm
The Board seeks a 12-month suspension from the practice of law. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:23 am
The group—which includes presidentially appointed experts from academia, non-governmental organizations, and industry—recommends a DOE-level version of the review by June 1, 2011, focused on DOE's activities. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
In remarks on December 12 at AICPA’s Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, Board Member Duane DesParte observed that the PCAOB does not operate in a vacuum and continues to assess developments of other standard setters and regulators, such as the IAASB. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Whether the criteria of exclusion is intersectional in nature, i.e. defined by another characteristic like age does not perforce justify that criteria as non-discriminatory upon any reasonable interpretation of Article 15(1).[16]Similarly, the argument that permission to enter other temples justifies denial of entry at Sabarimala is tantamount to saying that discrimination is not discrimination when made selectively. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:30 pm
(12) Jointly owned property, including jointly owned real estate [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
Okabe ReferenceOn Clouds's contention [that Okabe does not meet limitations of claim 1 are] incorrect. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:19 pm
So he does not lose coverage until January 1, 2010. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:29 am
June 12, 2007)* (unpublished). [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
[23] See supra note 12. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 10:47 pm
[23] See supra note 12. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
Charlesworth: does this go outside the exemption? [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
12/09/09 - Note this answer has been corrected following initial publication. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:25 pm
She mentioned the biotech tax credit that was adopted in 2009 and the current proposal to eliminate double taxation for certain small S corporations (since currently New York City does not recognize the federal treatment of S corporations as “pass through” entities). [read post]