Search for: "Daniel Shapiro"
Results 341 - 360
of 454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2012, 8:30 pm
The worst case for us is stability, and we’re in year three of stability right now,” explained Daniel F. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am
BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS (Stephen Shapiro, Mayer Brown): Prometheus's patent claims violate Supreme Court precedent forbidding claims that "preemp[t] all practical use of an abstract idea, natural phenomenon, or mathematical formula. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm
” For short pieces, there’s Daniel Crane of the University of Michigan on “Law over Economics in the 2023 Draft Merger Guidelines” in the Network Law Review. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:08 am
Dickstein Shapiro, a Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 4:54 am
Josh Shapiro (D) early on Sunday, forcing Shapiro and his family to evacuate. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Daniel Hemel and I have compared the cost-based reward of R&D tax credits with the typical patent reward (in a paper Ted has generously reviewed), and it seems worth thinking more about whether and when it makes sense to move this cost-based reward into the patent system.Drew Amerson & Robin Feldman, Gatekeeping Trends in Reasonable Royalty Cases – This paper surveys Daubert decisions involving reasonable royalty determinations from Jan. 1, 2008 to May 31, 2016, and concludes… [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
[Link] Dickstein Shapiro is searching for 2 IP associates with 2-5 years of experience in prosecution and litigation and a degree in EE to work at their DC office. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
Compare, for example (and for agreement, as much as difference), Carl Shapiro here, with the International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) here. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
” Also at The Gaggle, Daniel Stone evaluates the Chicago connections of three front runners (Garland, Kagan, and Wood). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
Briefly: At Forbes, Daniel Fisher contends that the Court’s unanimous opinions in in Sackett and Mayo “sent strong messages to Congress to clean up murky laws that brought these cases to their doorstep in the first place. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Daniel Walfish discusses the impact of the court’s decision in Lucia v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:30 pm
In an essay for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Professor Stuart Shapiro and Environmental Protection Agency economist Laura Stanley looked at the role of economists in federal regulatory agencies. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 3:00 am
Walton, a Bush appointee who had previously called Trump a “charlatan,” had before him a typical Jan. 6 case — that of Daniel Goodwyn, 35, of Corinth, Texas. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:33 am
At Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro foresees the confirmation process as a “perfect vehicle for a public airing” of debates over the meaning of the Constitution, in part because he thinks Kagan should be obliged to answer questions about her constitutional views as she counseled in that 1995 article. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:56 am
The WSJ Law Blog notes that Legal Zoom, cash machine for former O.J. lawyer Bob Shapiro, is the target of a class action. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:32 am
Murphy’s book Administrative Law and Practice is cited in the following article: Joshua Knobe & Scott Shapiro, Proximate Cause Explained: An Essay In Experimental Jurisprudence, 88 U. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
At Concurring Opinions, Daniel Solove has a detailed two-part analysis of the issues at stake in NASA. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm
Casto’s article The First Congress’s Understanding of Its Authority over the Federal Courts’ Jurisdiction is cited in the following article: Daniel D. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm
Challenges in Measuring Regulatory Capture Daniel Carpenter (Harvard University) | Wednesday, June 22 Regulatory capture, neither inevitable nor a death trap for agencies, must be reduced to advance public policy goals. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
Railroad Retirement Board (Nov. 2) Attorney David Shapiro, Jones v. [read post]
