Search for: "Daniel v. Paul" Results 341 - 360 of 849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Tags: Broker-dealers, Exchange Act, Financial institutions, Jurisdiction, Liability standards, Regulation SHO, SEC,Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Short sales, State law, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts Holding Activists and Proxy Advisory Firms Accountable? [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:19 am by Alex R. McQuade
Adam Klein provided a few thoughts on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
Thomas School of Law, on Thursday, May 19, 2016 Tags: Compliance & ethics, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial regulation, Fund managers, Private equity, Private funds,Securities regulation, Surveys Intersection of Deal-Related Indemnification and D&O Advancement Posted by Daniel E. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court‘s recent decision in Pritchard v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  Paul Bernal argues that the press’s actions in obtaining the story were deeply damaging in the first place and should also be scrutinised. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:41 am by Alex R. McQuade
Yishai Schwartz posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Bank Markazi v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
” At Article 8, Daniel Hensel praises retired Justice John Paul Stevens, arguing that “he truly embodies the academic and non-partisan nature of the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am by Alex R. McQuade
Robert Loeb and Helen Klein examined the Al Razak v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:16 pm by Alyson Carney
The students argued the merits of a fictitious case Brendan Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]