Search for: "David Paul v. John Williams" Results 341 - 360 of 389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2009, 9:22 pm
The occasion, Stevens' discussion with Cliff Sloan and David McKean, the authors of The Greatest Decision (2009), an excellent social history of Chief Justice John Marshall's landmark decision on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Former pension board member’s private finance, public role intersected, by David Zahniser   (May 9, 2009) Connecticut Paul J. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:26 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for himself and two other dissenters, speaks admiringly of the roots of liberty that go “far deeper” than the Constitution itself. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:22 am
Wade "an embarrassment" -- McConnell clerked for liberal Justice William Brennan Jr. and criticized Bush v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:10 am
This was arguably true, for example, of Lewis Powell, Harry Blackmun, Sandra Day O'Connor, and John Paul Stevens, to name only a few. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:55 pm
Souter and John Paul Stevens — did not explain their votes. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:20 pm
Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, joined by conservative Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, while Justice John Paul Stevens, dissented separately. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here2nd CircuitAlleyne v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:08 pm
In the new “victim impact” cases, Justice John Paul Stevens noted that the Court has not reviewed that type of evidence since its ruling 17 years ago in Payne v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Johns Hopkins University)Siegel Ron (Northwestern University)Smith David C. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens disagreed with the majority's analysis and thought "the absence of any limitation on the punitives" suggested lawmakers didn't wish to limit the liability of wrongdoers. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Attorneys who resisted Karl Rove (and paid the price), Will Taft, John Bellinger, etc., but also Republican jurists such as Sandra Day O'Connor (Hamdi and Rasul), Anthony Kennedy, David Souter and John Paul Stevens (those, plus Hamdan and Bo [read post]