Search for: "David R. Lord"
Results 341 - 360
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
British bill of rights ‘will put judges in a difficult position’ Lord Woolf, a former senior law lord warned that a British bill of rights would complicate the position of courts, which would have to consider the two conventions when deciding cases. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
" Id., R. 1.2(c). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
Please download: Recent Developments Lack of malice halts David Beckham’s $25m US libel bid. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
Among other things he confessed to hacking David Beckham’s phone and apologised for not halting the Milly Dowler phone hacking. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Lord knows they already have enough copies of Bowling for Columbine. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 11:51 am
Louis Cardinals slugger Albert Pujols on your fantasy squad, you have to root for Pujols to rack up HR, RBI, R, OBP, and SLG numbers while hoping the Cubbies survive the onslaught. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
In a speech entitled “General, Equal and Certain: Law Reform Today and Tomorrow”, given at the Lord Renton Lecture 2011, Lord Neuberger made the case for reconsidering codification in order to achieve clearer statute law. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
Two interesting speeches by Supreme Court judges, Lord Neuberger: Towards a European Law and Lord Hope: Sovereignty in Question. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd, heard 4 February 2015 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:28 am
The feudal lord or his men can do all manner of things that the serfs can not do. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
The orchestra was fabulous, our conductor (Stephen Lord) was all smiles in the pit, the chorus was relaxed and relieved (now that their opera scene showcases were over), and there was not one technical glitch. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:30 am
In 2007, the Lord Chief Justice of Britain announced that lawyers there would no longer be required to wear wigs, at least in civil and family court. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:18 am
- 18th Century Spanish Baroque Guitar Music by Santiago de Murcia, performed by Paul O'Dette (baroque guitar) with Andrew Lawrence-King, Pedro Estevan, Pat O'Brien, and Steve Player (Harmonia Mundi) Carl Rutti - Requiem - conducted by David Hill with the Bach Choir and Southern Sinfonia (Naxos) Julius Roentgen Cello Concertos, performed by Arturo Muruzabal, with Dutch radio orchestras conducted by Paul Watkins and Henrik Schaefer (Etcetera) [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
But two high court judges, Lord Justice Hooper and Mr Justice Cranston, ruled that they would not permit the application, saying the case did not raise legal issues of sufficient general importance. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:28 am
Dugot, Christie’s; David J. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:25 am
: on R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
In Parliamentary debate, Lord John Russell (who would serve as Prime Minister 1846-52 and 1865-66) explained the difference between English and Irish law on bearing arms: [T]he right to bear arms, which is the universal right in England, and qualified only by individual circumstances, is reversed in Ireland; the right to bear arms here being the rule, the right to bear arms in Ireland being the exception. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
22 June 2011 (b) Who was the Lord Justice Lord Justice Leveson (c) What were the cases? [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heardIn R 0003/15 of 28 November 2017 the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal found the right to be heard of the patentee infringed, annulled the Technical Board's decision and sent the case back for re-hearing. [read post]
