Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 341 - 360
of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2009, 3:34 am
Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 89 “Where a partner entrusted with the responsibility of dealing with all aspects of the firm's professional indemnity insurance failed to fulfil his obligations, a liability in damages to a client, for which the firm's professional indemnity insurer had refused indemnity, was a liability to be [...] [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:41 pm
Pierson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
The Volokh Conspiracy: “Several readers asked me why United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:19 pm
The post Working capital adjustments: lessons from De Santis and Iacobucci v Doublesee Enterprises Inc. appeared first on Deal Law Wire. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:11 am
However, the decisions in Fort Myers v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:38 am
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Szepietowski and Others Chancery Division “There was no exception in the exclusion regime of section 252 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, concerning restrictions on dealing with property, to confine attention to assets vested in trustees while disregarding their personal assets. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:28 pm
Catherine Ascani, Casenote, Deal or No Deal: It's a Deal in Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:59 am
R (Boughton and Ors) v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
A restraint of trade clause seeks to restrict the freedom of a person to trade or deal in specified ways with assets, information or third parties. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:30 am
Allan Shampine (Compass Lexecon) asks What Is at Stake with Supreme Court Review of United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:42 pm
On April 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:42 pm
On April 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:18 am
I requested that each of the parties in the election contest, Cooper v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:38 am
In the case of Jarden, the chancery court reasoned that the deal price was an unreliable indicator of fair value because Jarden’s CEO acted with little oversight and volunteered an acceptable price range before negotiations really began (Fir Tree Value Master Fund, LP v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:06 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:45 am
Perhaps the origin of modern exclusive dealing analysis is the Standard Station case of 1949, Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 10:04 am
Family Law Week has reported the case of Whitehouse-Piper v Stokes [2008] EWCA Civ 1049, which deals with the dreaded 'remarriage trap' in s.28(3) MCA.The Facts: The parties were divorced in 1994, the wife remarried in 1995 and the husband in 2004. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:11 pm
In Saskatchewan River Bungalows Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
That decision, Masimo Corp. v. [read post]
