Search for: "Department of Justice v. Spring"
Results 341 - 360
of 599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
If you are not familiar with the U.S. juvenile justice system, you can read a good summary of how it works here. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:26 am
About the only thing that seems clear after the argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
As Chief Justice, his major decisions – such as those in Brown v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Glatt v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:56 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:37 am
Whether it is a game-changer or not, we will report on this case again when the Supreme Court issues its decision–most likely in Spring 2016. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In September, in Mula v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 3:55 pm
That was the message from the Third Circuit on Tuesday when it told the plaintiffs in Hassan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am
Joining the Department of Justice after his clerkship, tapped to take on a key role in the Japanese internment camp controversy, he asks, “Who do we serve, the lawyers of Justice? [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am
And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am
V. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Department of Justice. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
For my money, the most interesting is Yates v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:14 am
Read the Baltimore Police Department Charging Documents here. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am
Wardlow, where Chief Justice Rehnquist offered this bit of sophistry: Such a holding is entirely consistent with our decision in Florida v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:21 am
Attorney General, swearing the oath of office at a Justice Department ceremony. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
As a third reason for the application of the statutory percentage to the total parental income, is that courts, including the Appellate Division, Second Department, have, in fact, routinely applied the statutory formula to combined parental income as high as and greater than $200,000 (see Scheinkman, New York Law of Domestic Relations, § 16.34, at 679; compare Matter of Brim v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
” Accordingly, Justice O’Conner ordered the Labor Department to stay implementation of the Final Regulation pending a decision on the merits of the states’ claims. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm
However, I want to make a point here that I believe the decision makers in the White House and the Department of Justice (and maybe even the Supreme Court) might consider:With all that is going on in connection with software patents, this is the worst time one could pick for destabilizing the software copyright system. [read post]
