Search for: "Diaz v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2018, 9:27 am
The United States Supreme Court addressed this question in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
Diaz v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:56 pm
E.g., State v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:13 am
State of Oregon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:29 pm
DIAZ, 40 M.J. 335 (C.M.A. 1994).United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:26 am
Medina and United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:58 am
For further information regarding the district court's final order, please refer to the Ruiz-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:10 am
On appeal the defendant argued that the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:28 am
When the New York legislature debated the Marriage Equality Act, Senator Diaz similarly stated: "We are trying to redefine marriage . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
The SJC, following the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez Diaz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
And so the Board granted opposer's motion to strike applicant's affirmative defense of priority.Read comments and post your comment here.TABlog comment: In Diaz v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:54 am
SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:21 am
Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:00 pm
In Melendez-Diaz, for example, the United States Supreme Court held that certificate of drug analyses, prepared by chemists when testing whether a particular item is a controlled substance, are testimonial in nature and, in order to be admissible, the drug lab experts should be called to testify. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:48 am
Second, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure now require a sentencing court, before accepting a guilty plea, to ensure that the defendant understands “that, if convicted, a defendant who is not a United States citizen may be removed from the United States, denied citizenship, and denied admission to the United States in the future. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Robert Beeler Power failed in his claim to federal constitutional protection from execution before the Florida Supreme Court as they relied upon their previous holding in Diaz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
United States, holding that evidence obtained through a search that was legal when it was conducted will not be subject to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
