Search for: "District Court For Southern Indiana" Results 341 - 360 of 1,290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
In denying the preliminary injunction, the Southern District Court of Indiana noted that Medlock was unlikely to succeed in his claim because once resident advisors were lawfully inside his room to perform a health and safety inspection and discovered marijuana, they were justified in giving access to law enforcement officers. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 10:10 am by Kenan Farrell
KimberlingCause: Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair CompetitionCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Richard L. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:28 pm
"Fed appeals court quashes bids to unravel Colorado marijuana laws, but door still open for RICO suits; Appeals court panel sends racketeering claim by southern Colorado horse ranchers back to district court; shuts down complaints by Oklahoma and Nebraska": Alicia Wallace of The Cannabist, a publication of The Denver Post, has this report. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:30 am by Harden Jackson, LLC
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana issued a decision allowing the placement of both females in a same-sex marriage on their child’s birth certificate. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:30 am by Harden Jackson, LLC
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana issued a decision allowing the placement of both females in a same-sex marriage on their child’s birth certificate. [read post]
23 May 2017, 5:34 am by Jim Singer
In the case, the defendant was organized under Indiana law and headquartered in Indiana. [read post]
18 May 2017, 5:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In the meantime, a Southern District judge has refused to dismiss a sexual orientation discrimination case under Title VII.The case is Philpott v. [read post]
This is particularly likely in the Eastern District of New York, which often shares views similar to the Southern District’s. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
This week, the Brandeis and University of Southern California decisions are joined by an order of the federal court in the Northern District of Indiana in the case of Doe v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:38 am by Kenan Farrell
The case was initially filed in Johnson County Superior Court but has been removed to the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
10 May 2017, 11:00 am by Kenan Farrell
Federation of American FootballCause: Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Common Law Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unjust Enrichment, Conversion, Deception, Indiana Crime Victim’s Relief ActCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Larry J. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana – Albany Division: U.S. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging patent infringement. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging patent infringement. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Heartland Consumer Products LLC and TC Heartland LLC, of Carmel, Indiana filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, the Indiana State Trademark Act, and the common law of the State of Indiana. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Heartland Consumer Products LLC and TC Heartland LLC, of Carmel, Indiana filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, the Indiana State Trademark Act, and the common law of the State of Indiana. [read post]
While that court found that the plaintiff had no viable claim for sexual orientation discrimination, it remanded the case to the Southern District of New York to address whether the plaintiff’s claims could be considered sex stereotyping discrimination. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:40 am by The Federalist Society
” Alternatively, Heartland sought transfer of the case to a venue in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]