Search for: "District of Columbia v. Smith"
Results 341 - 360
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
Because this is an arms ban case, the court should have applied the common-use test required by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
What does the Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Brett Wilson’s Media Law Blog has covered the case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB), which concerned the liability of a blogger for comments regarding a planning dispute. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the validity of the FCC order. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
The District of Columbia does not recognize cross-jurisdictional class action tolling. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:49 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 18-5232, Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
Randy Smith, an appointee of President George W. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
The district court held that E.M.D. had failed to prove the exemption applied by “clear and convincing evidence,” and the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
District of Columbia – which became Heller in the Supreme Court – were African American women. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
There are countless examples of this, but perhaps the best illustration is Cavazos v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
That's three.And, perhaps reflecting its federal roots, the highest court in the District of Columbia has applied Twombly/Iqbal pleading standards several times, in Murray v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The implications of the decision, which clarified the application of articles 8 and 10 of the Convention to determine the propriety of such powers, extend to the recently enforced Investigatory Powers Act 2018, as noted by the Cyberleagle Blog, Press Gazette and Graham Smith via INFORRM. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
Since the Justices’ ruling in 2008 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
For example, jumping the White House’s fence would be a violation of the District of Columbia’s trespass statute, which subjects jumpers to up to six months in jail. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:26 am
Roberts, 263 N.C. 336, 139 S.E.2d 593 (1965) and Smith v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit blocked that in a 2008 ruling. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Ft. [read post]
