Search for: "Doe, Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 51,285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Eccles (Saïd Business School), Richard Gardiner, and Andrea Webster, World Benchmarking Alliance, on Friday, April 26, 2024 Tags: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD, EU, Sustainability That Starbucks DEI Case Doesn’t Stand for What You Think It Does Posted by Scott Shepard, Stefan Padfield, and Ethan Peck (The National Center for Public Policy Research), on Saturday, April 27, 2024 Tags: dei, discrimination, Race, Shareholders, Starbucks Climate… [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Eccles (Saïd Business School), Richard Gardiner, and Andrea Webster, World Benchmarking Alliance, on Friday, April 26, 2024 Tags: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD, EU, Sustainability That Starbucks DEI Case Doesn’t Stand for What You Think It Does Posted by Scott Shepard, Stefan Padfield, and Ethan Peck (The National Center for Public Policy Research), on Saturday, April 27, 2024 Tags: dei, discrimination, Race, Shareholders, Starbucks Climate… [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Akorn Inc., et al.1 mapped out one means by which a court may evaluate mootness fees paid to individual shareholders after the voluntary dismissal of an action challenging a public company merger. [read post]
Supply, Inc., 2017 IL App (5th) 150117-U, ¶¶ 42-46 The specific conduct that courts have found to be oppressive varies. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
"Attorney General Jason Miyares today announced that the Office of the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Section has opened an investigation into AJP Educational Foundation, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Inc., 445 F.3d 597, the Second Circuit then opined "to state a quid pro quo sexual harassment the plaintiff must show a tangible employment action, i.e., that an explicit alteration in the terms or conditions of employment resulted from her refusal to submit to [a] sexual advance. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Inc., 445 F.3d 597, the Second Circuit then opined "to state a quid pro quo sexual harassment the plaintiff must show a tangible employment action, i.e., that an explicit alteration in the terms or conditions of employment resulted from her refusal to submit to [a] sexual advance. [read post]
(For discussion of why “shouting down,” even though expressive, is not protected from government prohibition, see this recent column by one of us.)Calling physical blockage peaceful because it does not involve overt and affirmative violent assaults on third parties does nothing to alter its lack of constitutional status. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Even under Pfizer, the McKesson court noted, “a defendant’s knowledge of his general legal obligations is not enough if he does not also know that his actions violate those obligations. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:18 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]