Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY" Results 341 - 360 of 36,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm by David Cosgrove
  Apparent authority is not “incident to” the attorney client relationship, nor does apparent authority arise by reason of the representation. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:40 am by The Docket Navigator
"[The inventor/attorney] does not fit the role of 'lawyer-litigant-witness' as contemplated by [Bottaro v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 3:36 am by Donald Dinnie
This Gauteng judgment Trident South Africa (Pty) Ltd / Bateman Trident (Pty) Ltd v Shainne John Taylore & 2 Others has reaffirmed that economic pressure does not in itself create a basis to escape a settlement agreement on the grounds of duress. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:21 pm
The Las Vegas Review Journal reports that a juror in the civil case of Suen v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Recently I was contacted by an attorney who asked “When does the 45 days to bring a motion to compel further responses to RPD begin? [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 3:48 pm
Proc., § 425.16) does not entitle a self-represented attorney to recover fees for bringing a successful anti-SLAPP motion. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:43 am by Phillips & Associates
Department of Justice Argues Title VII Does Not Apply to Gender Identity Discrimination in Brief to Supreme Court appeared first on New York Employment Attorney Blog. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor does the complaint contain allegations that there was continuous representation from 2002 forward regarding the structuring of the tax shelters (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 67-68 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]