Search for: "Doe v. Duncan" Results 341 - 360 of 484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 3:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  When the Court turned to the second case, Virginia v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:07 am by Muneer Awad
Muneer Awad is the plaintiff who filed the lawsuit against the State of Oklahoma in Awad v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Mr Justice Vos will hear applications in the phone hacking cases of Hoppen v NGN and Miller v NGN. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:48 pm by Darren O'Donovan
Implicit within pro-torture arguments is often the ability to distinguish the person who has information from one who does not. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
However, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled on April 19th that the smell of marijuana alone does not allow for police action. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:13 pm by CJLF Staff
Savage of the Los Angeles Times has this report on yesterday's 5-4 decision Cullen v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:30 am by INFORRM
The Privacy Injunction Fights Back, Duncan Lamont, Charles Russell Legal Update, 3 February 2011. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:16 am by INFORRM
  Duncan Lamont of Charles Russell is quoted as making the intriguing comment: ‘Logically it makes no sense at all. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am by Charon QC
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 9:16 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is what happened in the case styled, Occidental Life Insurance Company of California v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am by Michael Scutt
  On Twitter, Duncan Bannatyne became involved in a spat with legal journalist Darren Newman on the effect  the Equality Act would have in the workplace. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
This principle is not a rule: the law does permit wrong doers to profit from their wrongs in a variety of circumstances. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:28 am by Duncan Hollis
by Duncan Hollis A couple of years ago, Josh Newcomer and I argued that political commitments have developed to a point where they should receive constitutional scrutiny. [read post]