Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Doe, the Education of Undocumented Children, and the Polity, by Michael A. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
Hurley Int'l LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:13 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
As The Legal Intelligencer put it: In its 75-page opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
Appeals Court: Open and Obvious Rule The appeals court citing O’Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
This court recommends the opinion not be published on the ground it does not yet meet the standards for publication.The separate letter said:Chief Justice George: In the matter of Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:41 am
" [Terry v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:42 pm
Sullivan, and Rucker, JJ., concur. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 280 (1964)). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:50 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Sullivan, supra (quoting Roth v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The Final Rule does not require notification directly to affected consumers given that, as noted in the adopting release, such a requirement would be “largely duplicative” of existing state laws.[17] IMPLICATIONS The Final Rule adds to a range of overlapping data breach notification laws that have complicated the challenge for companies responding to significant cybersecurity and data privacy incidents. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
Sullivan back in 1964. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:56 pm
Does that explain it? [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
” Commenting on the absence of any stock certificate supporting Zwarycz’s claim, the court wrote: The mere fact that a corporation did not issue any stock certificates does not preclude a finding that a particular individual has the rights of a shareholder (see Kun v Fulop, 71 AD3d at 833; French v French, 288 AD2d 256, 256; Blank v Blank, 256 AD2d 688). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Does that affect the analysis? [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Ultimately, Judge Doughty’s opinion does nothing to answer these difficult questions. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
Sullivan Co. [read post]
