Search for: "Doe v. Trump et al"
Results 341 - 354
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
(The Trump administration sought a form of cost-cost regulatory budget analysis in EO 13,771, which President Biden rescinded on his first day.[3]) Biden has now moved to reinvigorate and “modernize” presidential regulatory review via OIRA, using improved BCA. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
Phelps, et al. (09-751). [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
But does all this drama signify anything? [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
[ii] (I leave aside for now whether that obligation is one that necessarily trumps all other reasons to do or not do X. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
Green issued his second supplemental decision Sept. 21, 2001. *** Tower Industries, Inc., d/b/a Allied Mechanical (31-CA-26605, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 117) Ontario, CA May 31, 2007. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Geeklawyer, an IP lawyer, does manage to slip in a bit of law from time to time - but, mercifully, his blawg provides, for me, other attractions. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
As a consequence of this shift, the limitation on interest deductibility is anticipated to raise significantly more federal revenue after 2021 than it does initially. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Although the demolition or renovation of a single-family residence is exempt from Asbestos NESHAP requirements, the exemption does not apply where the demolition is part of a larger commercial project. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
