Search for: "Does 1-194" Results 341 - 360 of 683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2023, 1:32 am by Frank Cranmer
Further, the protection of the traditional family based on the union between a man and a woman had recently been consolidated by the 2020 reform of the Russian Constitution [194]. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The report does not indicate what the company did to result in the penalty. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by admin
Litig., Case 1:19-md-02875-RBK-SAK, document 1958 (D.N.J. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
What relevance does the CRC framework hold for the interpretation and implementation of the Principles? [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:41 pm by Francis Pileggi
(The Chancery opinion weighed in at 194-pages long, and the Supreme Court’s opinion, including the concurrence, in total was just under 100-pages long.) [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:45 pm by David Luban
" Um, my lengthy discussion was 194 words, 21 of them quoting Taylor. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Credit Bureau Center, LLC, 2017 WL 680344, No. 17 C 194 (N.D. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:17 am by Michael Stern
If the House does certify a contempt before the end of the 117th Congress, it will be up to the Justice Department to decide whether to move forward with indictment and prosecution. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am by Paul Jacobson
[S. 15A inserted by s. 2 of Act 61 of 2002.]The Merchandise Act defines a “trade mark” as a “trade mark as defined in section 2 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1993 (Act 194 of 1993), and includes a well-known trade mark contemplated in section 35 of that Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am by Paul
The Merchandise Act defines a “trade mark” as a “trade mark as defined in section 2 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1993 (Act 194 of 1993), and includes a well-known trade mark contemplated in section 35 of that Act. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 pm by Paul
The Merchandise Act defines a “trade mark” as a “trade mark as defined in section 2 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1993 (Act 194 of 1993), and includes a well-known trade mark contemplated in section 35 of that Act. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
In law those matters are disregarded in the treatment of that rehabilitated person; But: However, that disregard does not extend any further. [read post]
However, the purchase does provide a clear example of a ‘success’ story in terms of the UK retaining a work of outstanding national importance whilst balancing all of the relevant parties’ rights. [read post]
However, the purchase does provide a clear example of a ‘success’ story in terms of the UK retaining a work of outstanding national importance whilst balancing all of the relevant parties’ rights. [read post]
However, the purchase does provide a clear example of a ‘success’ story in terms of the UK retaining a work of outstanding national importance whilst balancing all of the relevant parties’ rights. [read post]