Search for: "Does 1-30 defendants" Results 341 - 360 of 7,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2010, 2:43 pm by Jon Sands
In an appeal from a conviction and 30-year sentence for ecstasy drug offense, the 9th (M. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Marcel Pemsel
According to the German Supreme Court, it is the defendant (Converse I, I ZR 52/10, at para. 30). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally on June 1, 1960 these defendants were arraigned before this court, being represented by counsel who stated that said arraignment was consented to without prejudice to any rights of the defendants by reason of their arraignment. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:18 pm by John Floyd
  30 Year Sentence Goes Uncontested   Citing Wikkerink’s prior aggravated incest conviction, the judge instead imposed a 30-year sentence. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Significantly, the new law will require a defendant to pay all of the settlement amounts to the plaintiff within 30 days of the date that the signed release is tendered to the defendant. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:38 am by John Floyd
He informed the parties that the trial would resume at 1:30 p.m. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:52 am
For these reasons, the Court will grant defendant release pending his extradition, on conditions set forth in open court at the Status Hearing scheduled on June 5, 2008, at 1:30 p.m. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:25 am
She rejected arguments that the executive orders violated the Constitution, noting, “[t]he Supreme Court has ruled that a state does not commit a physical taking when it restricts the circumstances in which tenants may be evicted . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:12 am by Lewis Gainor
A fifth is a Class 1 felony with 4-15 years, while a sixth offense is a Class x felony with 6-30 years. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Said stipulation was incorporated and did not merge in a judgment of divorce dated September 30, 2005. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:38 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
On 30 November 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Musacchio v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm by David M. Trontz
A withhold of adjudication is critical, as a defendant who receives this benefit, does not have a criminal conviction on his or her record. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:23 pm
If it does not - the individual is NOT required to register as a sex offender because the out of state conviction does not fall within the statutory requirements of sections 16-22-103(1)(b), 18-3-411(1), 18-3-412.5(1), and 18-7-302(1)(a). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 1:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
After the company learned 1 settled my own debt they sent me a cease and desist and threatened to sue. [read post]