Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
S. 133, 136 (1955); see United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am
Defendants involved with drugs can be charged with federal or state crimes. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
These substances are categorized from most severe (schedule I) to least severe (schedule V).Illegal possession of a prescribed drug.Other illegal drugs. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 7:23 am
United States, 697 F.2d 1389, 1390 (Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
It has exported massage chairs to the United States since at least 1968. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 1:09 pm
” Once abuse is found, the Bill does not allow “pro-competitive effects” to be used to defend against a claim of abuse of dominance.[6] If the Bill passes, the New York Attorney General’s Office will issue further guidance on how it will interpret these provisions. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
Here is a summary of the plaintiff's allegations, from Judge Liam O'Grady's opinion denying a motion to dismiss: Plaintiff is a retired Senior Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force ("SMSgt. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for… [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 11:05 am
Applicant claims that in Matal v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
" NAACP v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
