Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 341 - 360 of 4,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2017, 1:32 am by Giesela Ruehl
Article 19, Paragraph 1 and 2, first alternative of Regulation (EG) No. 593/2008 does not apply, if the country according to that Article is not identifiable by the third party. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Was the United Kingdom using the Article 43(1) referral procedure for a purpose that it was not intended to serve? [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:29 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Does 1-43, 2013 WL 1874862) expressly recognized the concern that some production companies have been “misusing the subpoena powers of the court, seeking the identities of the Doe defendants solely to facilitate demand letters and coerce settlements, rather than ultimately serve process and litigate the claims. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:48 pm by Bill Marler
On November 1, 2023, Malichita brand cantaloupes were recalled in Canada. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
(The Sibley Lecture) (Georgia Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
While to some extent this is comparing apples to oranges, only in 1% of motor vehicle accident cases in Maryland does the jury award more than $500,000. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
The certified questions are: (1) Under Connecticut law, does absolute quasi-judicial immunity extend to conservators appointed by the Connecticut Probate Court? [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 8:50 pm by Iona Wright (UK)
This latest annual report is prepared in accordance with Article 99e(1) of the UCITS IV Directive. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 2:50 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
While the proposal provides for a delay of the mandatory compliance date for the new general QM rule, it does not include proposals to otherwise amend the rule, and does not address the fate of the seasoned loan QM rule. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
She acknowledged she told Jane Doe 1 defendant touched her inappropriately and Jane Doe 1 told her to `keep your mouth shut. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am by Patricia Hughes
Do sections 90Q.1 and/or 90Q.2 amend the Constitution of Canada? [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:29 am by Nedim Malovic
Instead, it is required that the applicant, by means of sufficient evidence, “must lend credence” (point 43) to the fact that it is the holder of the IP right at issue. [read post]