Search for: "Does 1-59" Results 341 - 360 of 3,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2019, 8:26 am
The said mark covered the same goods and services in the earlier three registrations as well as some additional goods and services.The Cancellation Division dismissed the application and the case was appealed to the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal.Legal frameworkArticle 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR) sets out that a trade mark shall be declared invalid where the applicant acted in bad faith at the time of filing the application for the trade mark. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 5:36 am
Here, the district court acknowledged, and BSC concedes, that claim 44 does not broaden the scope of coverage of the '762 patent. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:26 am
§ 757.69(1)(b), which allocates the power to issue search warrants to circuit court commissioners, does not impermissibly intrude upon "[t]he judicial power" granted to the courts by Article VII, Section 2 of the Wisconsin Constitution, we hold that § 757.69(1)(b) is constitutional. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor does the complaint contain allegations that there was continuous representation from 2002 forward regarding the structuring of the tax shelters (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 67-68 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:50 am by Stanley D. Baum
In Notice 2012-59, the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") and other agencies provide guidance (or at least temporary guidance) on the 90-day waiting period limitation imposed under section 2708 of the Public Health Service Act (the "PHS Act"). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 9:12 pm by Pamela Pengelley
Every operator of a food premise shall ensure that in respect of the food premise,… (e)    every room where food is manufactured, prepared, processed, handled, served, displayed, stored, sold or offered for sale is kept free from,… (ii) subject to section 60, live birds and animals; 60. (1)  Subclause 59 (e) (ii) does not apply to, (a)    a service dog serving as a guide for a blind person or for a person with another medical… [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Aurelia J. Schultz
  Art. 59 limits design rights to industrial and commercial activities. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:59 am by Tobias Thienel
Nor does it allow a state to keep in operation fundamental rules of its own legal system, no matter what the effect of these rules on the relevant rights. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:44 am by Cooper, Adel & Associates
Distributions out of the account after age 59½ are taxed as ordinary income at each individual's tax rate. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:39 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Rule 59 motions “should be granted …when previously unavailable evidence becomes available[.] [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:35 am by Angelina Cameron
But how do you do it, and what does it mean for your taxes and reporting requirements? [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
It inter alia noted that the circumstance that a mark has an overall shape that is similar to variants of the product, which are usually available on the market, does not permit the finding that the mark, as a whole, departs significantly from the customary shapes in the sector.Ultimately, the Court agreed with the BoA that “the shape of the contested mark corresponds to the common shape of after-ski boots, which generally consist of a high shaft, often in a light synthetic material,… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
Unfortunately, the problem of retained surgical instruments is very real, with Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare (PSQH) reporting that estimates range from 1 case of retained instruments in every 1,000 surgeries to 1 case of retained instruments for every 19,000 injuries. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:35 am
The bonus credits add an additional 1% to 5% to the premium payments. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:40 am
 Registration was granted in 1999 (in 2014 the trade mark was transferred to Rubik’s Brand).In 2006, Simba Toys filed an application for a declaration of invalidity of the mark, on the basis of what are now Articles 59(1)(a) and 7(1)(a)-(c) and (e) EUTMR. [read post]