Search for: "Douglas v State"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
" — Douglas Brinkley "John Marshall Harlan is one of the most fascinating and important figures of modern America, and this book does him justice. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 3:43 pm
From Dean v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
McClure v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:00 am
Woodson v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:28 am
Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, and Martha M. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
19 May 2021, 7:19 am
United States—then a case like Johnson v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:40 am
Halderman (1981), and South Dakota v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court case, Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:00 am
Cosey v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
He also pointed to the discussions in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Recent SPAC Shareholder Suits in New York State Courts: The Beginning Wave of SPAC Litigation Posted by Douglas A. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am
The point indirectly was brought home by Professor Daniel Kleinberger’s recent article for the ABA’s Business Law Section in which he dissects last year’s decision by a Connecticut appellate panel in Manere v Collins interpreting that state’s Revised Uniform LLC Act which expressly includes oppression as one of the grounds for judicial dissolution. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
And last Friday night, in Tandon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In Allard v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm
Paul Douglas Foote, James R. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
