Search for: "Downloader 97" Results 341 - 360 of 497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 4:48 am
The claimant in the proceedings, Atari, had taken objection to the distribution of the game via the RapidShare site, and argued that the hosting service had a legal responsibility to block downloads. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Refusal of the application under Article 97(1) EPC is therefore to be expected. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus claim 1 according to auxiliary requests II or III go beyond the content of the application as originally filed, [which violates] A 123(2).Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.If you want to have a look at the file history, click here. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus none of the requests complies with the requirements of A 76(1).The appeal is dismissed.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
An astonishing 97% of the employers said that they frequently use social media to communicate with their employees. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
This view has, in the meantime, been confirmed in G 3/08 [7.2.5]. [2.2] Consequently, this Board takes the view that the rulings and rationes decidendi in the above decisions, in particular in G 1/97, are still valid under the revised provisions of EPC 2000. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 1:50 pm by Jeralyn
The first time I downloaded it disabled my internet connection connection by installing some new adapter. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
To take the principle of good faith that far would imply, in practice, that the Boards of Appeal would have to systematically assume the responsibilities of the parties to proceedings before them, a proposition for which there is no legal justification in the EPC, nor in general principles of law (G 2/97 [4.2]). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the application was refused under A 97(2). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm by Ashley S. Miller
Download a copy of the agenda here (pdf) [1] Cuomo 2010, Cleaner Greener NY, at 1 (2010). [2] Id. at 7. [3] Id. at 91-92. [4] Id. at 94. [5] Id. at 96. [6] Id. at 95. [7] Id. at 97-98. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm by Oliver G. Randl
On the contrary, it is incumbent upon the appellant to maintain unamended or to amend - optionally on an auxiliary basis - the application documents upon which examination is to be carried out and a decision eventually to be reached (A 94 and A 97 together with A 113(2) EPC 1973) (see T 300/89 [9.1]), and not upon the ED to prolong the examination procedure beyond the procedural framework set out in the EPC (see in this respect A 123(1) together with R 86(3) EPC 1973) until the applicant… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:06 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Implicitly this meant that a patent could not be granted (A 97(1) in conjunction with A 78(1)(c) EPC 1973), and had to result in the refusal of the application (A 97(2)). [1.3.1] In this context the relevant legal question is whether the statement of grounds of appeal sets out why, according to the appellant, the ED was not correct in basing its decision on the ground that there was no set of claims admitted under R 137(3). [1.3.2] The text of R 137(3) which is applicable to the… [read post]