Search for: "Drake v. Drake"
Results 341 - 360
of 537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 10:03 am
Cert. petitions: Drake v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:22 am
Delfino
Subscription Required
BRONX COUNTYCivil Practice
Defendants Answer Properly Verified; Plaintiffs' Rejection of Same Improper
Drake v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:32 am
| AIPPI Congress Report 1: The Art of IP - Museums & Architecture | AIPPI Congress Report 2: Trade Secrets - Views from In-House Counsel | AIPPI Congress Report 3: Brexit, IP in Fashion and Customs & Border Control | Monday Miscellany | Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d’auteur | Guest Post: Copyright Troll-[ing] Canadian Courts? [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
My company was contacted by Fifth Third, whom is your mortgage holder [sic] in an effort to resolve your foreclosed home located at 11288 Drake Road, North Royalton, Ohio 44133. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Rap IP diss songs: Tupac Shakur’s Hit ‘Em Up v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:08 pm
Gilberthorpe v Hawkins and Others, The Times, 3 April 1995, McCowan and Ward LJJ and Sir Roger Parker, allowed an appeal against a judgment of Drake J striking out a libel action on the ground of delay. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
The trial court recognized that the multi-step procedures articulated by the Tennessee Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
On January 5, 2007, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Panetti v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
v=F_rTMNnxwSE [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
”, invoking the aftermath of Worcester v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 1:45 am
Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
Then, after a mounting fire storm of critical commentary, the Chancellor Michael V. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:29 pm
Judge Leon's decision was based on a Supreme Court case decided in 2000 called FDA v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
v=F_rTMNnxwSE [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:28 pm
Drake Publishers, 811 F.2d 26, 33 (1st Cir. 1987). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am
A legal malpractice claim requires, among other things, the existence of an attorney-client relationship between the client and the attorney (see Maddux v Schur, 16 AD3d 873, 874 [3d Dept 2005]; Tabner v Drake, 9 AD3d 606, 609 [3d Dept 2004]). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Mein v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:52 am
The case is Drake v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
In the recent case of Barrett v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 9:57 pm
Justice Drake in that decision (Phosy & White v. [read post]
