Search for: "Duncan v State"
Results 341 - 360
of 761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2014, 6:55 am
On the journalism front, Wells noted the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Hedges v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am
Duncan, 2014 U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:47 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:53 am
The case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, the New Hampshire Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Duncan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
Ruling on an issue of first impression for the state’s high court on Friday in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Duncan Thompson (Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 11:43 am
But in State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 2:46 pm
Seal of the United States National Council on Disability. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
’ ” Duncan’s Point Lot Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 10:28 am
(Nick Rosenkranz) Radiolab just did a nice segment about Bond v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:11 am
(Orin Kerr) Yesterday the Fourth Circuit handed down an interesting Fourth Amendment decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 4:26 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 2:49 pm
This is not to suggest the odd formalism of Lochner v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
*** * In its Stewart decision, the Appellate Division states "Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably “to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force,” (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
