Search for: "Dunn v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 1,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
And they also understand that the state’s ostensible goal—anti-pollution—could be more precisely accomplished by a law that is more directly tailored to the state’s purpose, a ban on littering (as the Court reasoned in Schneider v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand It is reported that two of the defendants in the case of Newton v Dunn [2017] NZHC 2083 is to appeal. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:35 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
” Famous cases in which the Court has held that speech was impermissibly compelled include: West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Posted by William Magnuson, Texas A&M Law School, on Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Banks, Bitcoin, Crowdfunding, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial reporting, Financial technology, Innovation, International governance, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, SIFIs, Systemic risk OCC Stakes Out a Lead Role in Establishing New… [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:40 am by Florian Mueller
About a month and a half ago, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that Samsung had not waived its "article of manufacture" argument in the first Apple v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by The Federalist Society
Dunn involved the scope of a state’s duty, identified by the Supreme Court in its 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898, 903 (1986) (“A state law implicates the right to travel . . . when it uses ‘any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of that right.'” (quoting Dunn v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898, 903 (1986) (“A state law implicates the right to travel . . . when it uses ‘any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of that right.'” (quoting Dunn v. [read post]