Search for: "E.G. Taylor" Results 341 - 360 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
Alongside clear and attractive press releases, the court produces video explanations (e.g. this one of the murder sentence case) and podcasts to explain the rulings. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:06 am
And here we are talking very small businesses, not, e.g., smaller reporting companies. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:57 pm by Maryland Employment Law Letter
Kevin McCormick is a partner with the Baltimore firm Whiteford, Taylor & Preston and chair of its Labor and Employment Section. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm
One of the most interesting e-mails, and most convincing of arguments, she received was from Roland Mallinson of Taylor Wessing (picture, left). [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 11:17 am by Chris Sutton
If you need assistance with COVID-19-related HR issues or questions, please contact Doug Taylor at (703) 525-4000 or rdougtaylor@beankinney.com or your current Bean, Kinney & Korman attorney. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 8:10 am by Adam Levitin
 Yes, there are lots of possible defenses, e.g., lack of scienter. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
@prosperitygary calls for strategic thinking: https://bit.ly/3KbHTSS @prosperitynowJim Taylor: It’s Time to Heal In this piece I reflect on today’s observance of the 6th Annual National Day of Racial Healing and how it can inspire nonprofit boards. [read post]
Rosenthal and Alexander Ashrafi are attorneys with Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., in Baltimore, Maryland, and Richmond, Virginia, respectively. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 7:31 am by Chris Sutton
If you have questions or need any assistance concerning guidance around pay transparency in your workplace, please contact Doug Taylor at (703) 525-4000 or rdougtaylor@beankinney.com. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:35 am by Chris Sutton
Employer liability for workplace harassment by a non-supervisory coworker is the familiar negligence standard of care, e.g., that the employer knew or should have known about the harassment but failed to take corrective action to stop it. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:10 pm by Venkat
(See, e.g., "Do the FTC's New Endorsement/Testimonial Rules Violate 47 USC 230? [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
(Jan-Feb. 2006) Initially, I thought this list reflected a predictable GMU center-right bias (e.g., Roberts, Posner, Bybee, Kozinski). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
  At yet other times, Liptak points to snapshots of some of the legal history behind the movement for same-sex marriage (e.g., cases such the California Supreme Court’s 1947 opinion in Perez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
" As to the second prong, the Board found "the record supports a finding that consumers may encounter clothing of the type identified in the involved application that are made of black fleece [e.g., coats, jackets, and gloves] , ... customers are likely to believe that BLACK FLEECE misdescribes the identified goods. [read post]