Search for: "Earl v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
It is not really one of the great cases (it takes up only a handful of pages in the United States Reports). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975), the Supreme Court decided what procedural protections are due under the United States Constitution in cases of student suspensions for 10 days or less. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Needham, MA; Earl Gray Iv, President) Affordable Insulation Company, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
The appeal in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
Buono, United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:39 pm
Bush nominated Chief Judge Saad to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in 2001, 2003, and 2005, but he was not confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
V .... [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:06 pm
Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court declared Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statutes unconstitutional, overturning Pace v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:08 pm
From the New York Times: Judge Wood has established herself on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in the view of scholars and lawyers, as an unflinching and spirited intellectual counterweight to Judges Posner and Easterbrook. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:36 pm
United States will be written later. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:42 am
The questions before the court are whether the random drug testing policy adopted by the Board as a state actor violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article III, § 6 of the West Virginia Constitution, and the right to privacy as it is recognized in this state. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 9:57 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:00 am
N.Y.; Doubleday, 1977)In 2000, as was her custom, United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day-O'Connor spent election night at a party. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
The United States presented no r other evidence to controvert that offered by Knellinger. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:24 pm
Certain to provoke heated debate, Dishonorable Passions is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of sexuality and its regulation in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
