Search for: "Energy Brands, Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The hearing officer rejected the application on the ground that the machine contravened the first law of thermodynamics, which states that energy can be neither created nor destroyed. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Body Blue Inc.; Synergism Arithmetically Compounded Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
Joe to the big screen, and with video game and technology companies to feature Hasbro brands. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm by Eric Goldman
Internet Brands, Inc., 824 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2016) (ISP not immune to failure to warn claim) and Huon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
Pensacola Shipyard Reichold Chemical Tenneco Chemicals, Inc. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:47 am by admin
  As we continue our review of financially windy March, New York City was also the focal point for my study of the value of demolition-rebuilding in public housing, presented in Not only better but also cheaper:   Would you rather spend $138 and get 360 brand-new objects, or spend $130 and get 269 used objects? [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Patents give branded drug makers the right, for a limited time, to exclude generic firms from the market. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
Unfortunately for Microsoft, this definition was never brought up at trial and therefore, following Conoco Inc v Energy & Envtl, Int'l L.L.C. (2006), the Court held that Microsoft hadwaived their right to present new claim construction arguments: their motion in respect of this and infringement by the doctrine of equivalents was thus denied. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Fisher-Price, Inc., 485 F.3d 1157, 1161 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:08 am
Spotlight King & Spalding Left Out of Longtime Client Coke's $4.1 Billion Deal Fulton County Daily Report Industry observers have viewed Coca-Cola's purchase of Energy Brands and the Glaceau brand as Coke's embrace of the new world of vitamin-enhanced beverages. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 8:19 am by Vincent LoTempio
In fact, according to a 2007 survey by Manpower Inc., a leader in the employment services industry, 41 percent of U.S. companies had difficulty filling positions. [read post]