Search for: "English v. English"
Results 341 - 360
of 11,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:37 pm
Exceptionally strong writing skills in English, preferably journalistic in nature. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:37 pm
Exceptionally strong writing skills in English, preferably journalistic in nature. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
Rabiat Akande & Faisal Bhabha, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper: Insulating the Church: Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Canada v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
"[L]exicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
As I previously noted in People v Gobrick, 510 Mich 1029, 1029 (2022) (WELCH, J., concurring), “lexicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am
The English High Court dismissed the case, however ClientEarth was granted an oral hearing at the High Court to have it reconsider their dismissal. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
It is theoretically possible that the SCOTUS could draw nourishment from Ottawa to fatten up Chevron step two, in the same way that Justice Kagan rescued Auer deference from the hangman’s noose by giving it a highly contextual and reasoned structure in Kisor v Wilkie (see also the discussion of Chevron’s footnote 11 in the amicus brief of Professors Barnett and Walker). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 12:14 pm
(V Putin Address 12 Sept 2023)Mr. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
"The Second Circuit held years ago (Haley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:46 am
Henrik Lehment, whose English rhetoric was concise, easy to follow, and persuasive. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smyth v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
All of this is nicely evidenced in a recent publication-projection, shot out of the organs of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the text of which follows below (in the original Chinese and in official English; and French). [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
In Koilova and Babulkova v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:18 am
In this English judgment, the court considered whether it was appropriate to impute to individual underwriters’ material information they did not actually know, but the claims team did. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: AA v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
The relevant English-speaking public understands the application as ‘lock Putin up’, ‘Putin’ obviously being a reference to the President of the Russian Federation. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
