Search for: "English v. Jones"
Results 341 - 360
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
We’ll begin with the following sample citation in the OSCOLA style: Jones & others v Wright [1991] 3 All ER 88. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
The white or dark rum has been a subject of literature and legend for centuries, becoming associated with the English privateers and pirates, which was further bolstered by Treasure Island. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 am
Is “substantial harm” different from the “real and substantial tort” test set out by the Court of Appeal in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) – which has been applied in a number of recent cases (see our post here)? [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 1:35 pm
" Jones v. [read post]
MBL/Inforrm Conference Paper: “Defamation Bill: Trivial Libels and Jurisdiction” – Hugh Tomlinson QC
20 Jul 2010, 4:30 am
The Explanatory Notes to the Bill point out that there is already jurisdiction, deriving from the case of Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) to strike out a case as an abuse of the process if the publication does not amount to a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
The decision follows along with an English translation of the Chinese State Secrets Law provided by Human Rights China (and used by the Court). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
There is already jurisdiction, deriving from the case of Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) to strike out a case as an abuse of the process if the publication does not amount to a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
These are ordinary English words that the law does not allow me to help you with, beyond the written directions [he had already given them]“. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2009)Affirming that multiple plaintiff claims of discrimination etc were frivolous and that a plaintiff's attorney engaged in sanctionable conduct; remanded $660K+ atty fees order for more refined computation of amounts>> Noted here: Central Ohio Employment Law Update7th Circuit>> Jones v City of Springfield, No. 08-2085 (7th cir. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
In his dissent from denial of cert earlier this year in Silvester v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:15 am
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
This qualified authority, unlike the power often exercised in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by the English Crown, is limited to the promotion of advances in the “useful arts. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
Katz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
"Ø April 1, 2009 decision hereØ SCOTUS docket hereØ SCOTUSwiki hereØ Noted here: Jones Day; Mintz Levin; Ogletree DeakinsArgued - Awaiting Decision AT&T v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
