Search for: "F.D.A."
Results 341 - 360
of 431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2009, 9:50 pm
According to the The New York Times, an unusual internal meeting is scheduled for Wednesday (4/22/09) at the Food and Drug Administration and may signal how agency officials intend to handle the many controversies swirling around its embattled device division. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 12:34 pm
David Acheson, associate commissioner for foods at the FDA as stating, "F.D.A. needs to do more inspections. . .the system needs to be modernized to address the challenges and changes of the globalization of the food supply and rapid distribution chains. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:51 pm
"Last year, to win approval for a new heart cable from the Food and Drug Administration, the company agreed to provide the F.D.A. with future data from '10 experienced extraction centers,' according to agency records. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 11:50 am
What happened next is not clear, because the F.D.A. redacted portions of the report before releasing it. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 8:32 pm
Further, the F.D.A. lacks mandatory recall authority of tainted products. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:47 am
Despite an F.D.A. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Ronald Rogers, a spokesman for Merck, said, “We believe state courts should not be second-guessing the doctors and scientists at the F.D.A. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
" The majority went on to conclude, "It is a central premise of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the F.D.A.'s regulations that the manufacturer bears responsibility for the content of its label at all times. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" But fibromyalgia, once thought to be psychosomatic, only affects a relative handful of people.There are two drugs on the market that have received F.D.A. approval for treatment of fibromyalgia . . . [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:18 pm
The lawmakers, as well as patient advocates and others, say the Supreme Court's medical device decision has left patients legally powerless against what they criticize as spotty oversight of products by the F.D.A. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
But there were soon reports of liver damage, and the F.D.A. recommended in 1999 that Trovan be used only for severely ill patients in institutional settings. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 7:26 am
In 2004, the F.D.A. allowed limited use of OP-1 putty in patients who had failed spinal fusion procedures. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 2:16 pm
"The F.D.A. has shown itself incapable of keeping dangerous products off the market, and now the Supreme Court has said patients can't sue companies for redress. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 7:05 am
He was quoted as follows: "The F.D.A. has shown itself incapable of keeping dangerous products off the market, and now the Supreme Court has said patients can't sue companies for redress. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 3:32 am
" Still, Pallone believes "patients needed more legal leverage," and, "Tort actions serve as backstop to the F.D.A. and provide another level of protection. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
"The F.D.A. has shown itself incapable of keeping dangerous products off the market, and now the Supreme Court has said patients can't sue companies for redress. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
In its (falsely) reassuringly subtitled booklet "The Food Defect Action Levels: Levels of Natural or Unavoidable Defects in Foods That Present No Health Hazards for Humans," the F.D.A.'s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition establishes acceptable levels of such "defects" for a range of foods products, from allspice to peanut butter. . . . [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
The F.D.A. actually condones a certain percentage of "natural contaminants" in our food supply â€â [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:28 pm
The F.D.A. has received reports of patients' being prescribed such medicines to treat something as simple as a sprained ankle. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:23 pm
’ The law should have been enacted years ago, and this made us wonder, what does the F.D.A. even do? [read post]
