Search for: "FEDERAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. DEFENSE "
Results 341 - 360
of 1,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
The International Hunter Education Association. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:04 am
We also had two cases (John Wiley & Sons; Pearson Education v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
Board of Education, 91 F.3d 1547 (3d Cir. 1996). [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:47 pm
Outdoor Amusement Business Association, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
GriffinDocket: 10-854Issue(s): Whether application of New York's state constitutional “meaningful representation” standard to evaluate Sixth Amendment claims of ineffective assistance of counsel results in decisions that are "contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law" as required by the federal habeas statute.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:01 pm
at *15 (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Petitioner's reply Reichle v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am
Board of Education. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
Board of Education. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
Harris Associates, and American Needle v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 1:40 pm
Board of Education). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al.Reply of petitioner Swanson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
Defense counsel objected to this condition, insisting that K.H. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:00 pm
Clanton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 8:10 am
That is because both sides in the case of Morse v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Mark Walsh of the “School Law” portion of the blog Education Week provides coverage. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
His first argument on appeal was that the judge’s ruling that Ward was not qualified to give expert testimony about tampering on his computer “`was an abuse of discretion and deprived [him] . . . of his state and federal constitutional due process right to present a defense. [read post]
