Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
 The Ninth Circuit’s precedent in United Steel Workers Int'l Union v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
Ford Mtr Co    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitBOYCE F. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:18 am by Ronald Mann
The first week of the November session brings the justices once again to the False Claims Act, with Tuesday’s argument in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
The plaintiff, a former insurance agent, brought a putative class action against New York Life Insurance Company (the “defendant”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking recovery of unpaid overtime and wage reductions. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:01 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Rodríguez co-authored the article The Income and Consumption Tax Reform in the United States, published in the Journal of Social Economics and Business of the Cooperative Institute for Public Economics and Financial Law, in Barcelona, Spain. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:33 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On August 23, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Retailer Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am by Jack Pringle
   ESAB Group sued these insurers in state court in Florence seeking coverage under several insurance policies, and the insurers removed the case to federal court. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am by Jack Pringle
   ESAB Group sued these insurers in state court in Florence seeking coverage under several insurance policies, and the insurers removed the case to federal court. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Bexis
  The court held otherwise, finding the claims to be “squarely within the parameters” of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
Co. of North Am., No. 06-CV-00545, filed February 9, 2006, in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, and certified as a nationwide class action (covering a class that, according to defense attorneys, includes annuity transactions that “overlap those in Negrete”); and Castello v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]