Search for: "Federal v. Sears"
Results 341 - 360
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Federal Ins. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., supra, 547 F.3d at 744–46. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:16 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 08-1590, 2008 WL 4709500 (7th Cir. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court>Federal Appellate Court Decisions> State Roundup>Topical> Articles/Reports/Books>Foreign SpotlightTo begin, scan the link descriptions below and click.U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Sears, No. 89-CV-1353, 1997 WL 736532 at *16-19 (N.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
Thorogood v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:47 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:22 pm
Citing Sears, Roebuck & Co.v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP finance) What a concept: sharing new inventions with the world is good for the inventor (Techdirt) Global - Copyright On verifying the Commons (Creative Commons) Australia High Court rules on contributory patent infringement: Northern Territory v V Collins & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) Valuating IP: reputation in trade marks and section 60 evidence? [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:28 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co., No. 08-1590, slip op. at 3 (7th Cir. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 1:45 am
Sears Roebuck and Co., 664 S.E.2d 569 (N.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:24 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 496 F. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Klein v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:14 pm
" Ryman v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
" There would be no liability "[s]o long as the pharmacy is acting within the rules and regulations set forth by the state and federal governments. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 382 (5th Cir. 1978). [read post]
