Search for: "First Pro Group, Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 1,196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
As property, the trademark has monetary value, see Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
After the registration, LAH applied to an organization that connects non-profit groups with law firms providing pro bono legal assistance, but after five or six weeks, it learned that it wasn’t selected for services. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Many pro-life advocates are understandably upset when they have to subsidize pro-choice groups, and vice versa. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm by Eric Goldman
First, we find no basis in the ordinary meaning of ‘publisher,’ the other text of Section 230, or decisions interpreting Section 230, for concluding that an interactive computer service is not the ‘publisher’ of third‐party information when it uses tools such as algorithms that are designed to match that information with a consumer’s interests. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
The plaintiff first became aware of the problems more than four years before suit was filed. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by Marty Lederman
  Accordingly, House committees have subpoenaed Trump's accountants (Mazars, Inc.) and his banks (Deutsche Bank and Capital One) to produce Trump’s own (and his family’s and businesses’) financial records within their custody, and the Ways and Means Committee has asked (and eventually subpoenaed) the Treasury Department to turn over Trump’s federal tax records.Trump'a accountants and banks are not objecting to the House subpoenas, but… [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The new policy will be tested with a ban on the dehumanization of religious groups. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
 The first is that probably the four highest profile design cases in the UK in recent years (Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936, Dyson v Vax [2011] EWCA Civ 1206, Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, and PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12 (i.e. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Adonis Hoffman, Esq.
  The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) was among the first, and potentially the strongest, pro-consumer privacy laws to emerge in the states. [read post]