Search for: "Florida v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 6,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Zendejas v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:23 pm
S., at 165–168; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:41 am
Facts: This case (ADT LLC, et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:06 am
Allegedly, the defendant appealed, arguing that the court failed to consider the impact of United States v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 3:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Usery v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:20 pm
In late November 2021, Respondent told Petitioner that she needed to take the children to the United States so that G.L.W. could attend an appointment with an endocrinologist in Florida. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:19 pm
See Navani v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
Noble House sued to recover its damages, first in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on October 12, 2020. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:44 pm
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees "an individual right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
After the oral arguments in Twitter v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 3:56 pm
United States. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:00 am
A Class V injection permit, either from the EPA or a state with an approved program, must be obtained to inject the processed brine. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
” The defendants ought to serve lengthy terms of incarceration because of their participation in a months-long conspiracy that aimed to oppose by force the authority of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The United States legal system is immensely complex. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:37 pm
A finding that there was a solemnized marriage would require an analysis of religious doctrine, which could offend the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:26 am
The United States legal system is immensely complex. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
The Fourth Circuit considered the intersection of open carry and Terry in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
Raich (2005) (Thomas, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]