Search for: "Foote v. Grant"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
(Bell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:45 am
The Commercial Court duly granted both the declaratory and final injunctive relief sought. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:25 am
In Bloomfield v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
United States and Dalmazzi v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:41 am
Summary judgment was granted to defense. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 12:54 pm
The assumption of risk defense was recently upheld in the Centre County trial court decision of Vail v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:35 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
The respondents again applied to have the s.4(2) order lifted on the footing that there were no pending/imminent proceedings. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:37 am
Carson v Brown, 883 SE2d 908 (GA App. 2/7/2023) [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
In Hirshfield v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:00 am
In Gale v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 5:48 am
One very recent case, Bisbing v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
Facts: This case (Vazquez v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 4:45 am
In Mescall v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:23 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Michael Tappin QC (sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court) It is common in English patent litigation for patentees to make an application to amend a patent post grant and in the course of litigation pursuant to section 75 of the Patents Act 1977 – for example in order to delete invalid claims in order to remove dependencies or to hone the claims in order to make them more impregnable as a validity challenge. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:47 pm
Puleo v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
Puleo v. [read post]
