Search for: "Foster v. California" Results 341 - 360 of 758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2007, 11:44 am
., including California and New York, but construing different statutory language. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
In short, Perez was precisely the sort of lawyer-driven, artificial litigation fostered by California's notoriously broad consumer protection statutes.There was, in addition, something of an oddball claim in Perez - violation of a California statute called the Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act (Cal. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Daniel Summers hopes that in Fulton v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
This post examines an opinion from the California Court ofAppeal – First District, Division 5: People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:21 am
Foster question presented to a number of State Supreme Courts. . . . [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 4:25 am by WIMS
". . .we affirm the district court’s holding that the Charpieds lack standing under NEPA, the National Park Service Organic Act, and the California Desert Protection Act. . . [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am by Michael F. Smith
  That was the Court’s holding Wednesday in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
California Coastal Commission. [read post]