Search for: "Frank White v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
RumsfeldDocket: 11-1277Issue(s): Whether federal officials responsible for the torture of an American citizen on American soil may be sued for damages under the Constitution.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (4th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioners White v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Research & resources Eugene Volokh, ‘First Amendment Protection for Search Engine Results‘ – a white paper for Google [PDF] [Wired report], April 2012 Jeffrey P. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:08 pm
Among the key findings (according to an email on the case) in the expert report [updated link] of Matt Barreto and Gabriel Sanchez in Frank v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:07 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
In that case, lawyers for Warren McCleskey—who had been sentenced to death for killing Atlanta police officer Frank Schlatt—proved that black defendants are statistically more likely than whites to face the death penalty, and that murderers whose victims are white are more likely to face death than killers whose victims are black. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
The state regulatory association stated: Election-year politics have blinded Congress and the White House to the unintended consequences of the JOBS Act, which while well intentioned, could do little more than open the floodgates to investment fraud. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:33 am
Moyer quoted a passage from Judge Jerome Frank's dissent in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
Let's be frank. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:22 pm
They also allowed some frank statements and questions. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
Salvio v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
White. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
Herbert explained that Reagan was "tapping the code;" that talking about states' rights in that particular venue was a clear signal that he was not going to favor African Americans over whites. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:32 am
“It made me feel like I was back in 1960, that racism is still very much alive,” Laverne Keys, who was excluded in the 1999 case State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Kim Kardashian v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
They stated that they then immediately contacted the other side.In short, they tried to put the blame on the client and on Counsel.This didn’t get them very far. [read post]
