Search for: "Frank v. Securities"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2017, 7:35 am
Somers, the first whistleblower case under the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) to reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:31 pm
At an open meeting on Wednesday morning, the SEC adopted final rules to implement Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act regarding securities whistleblower incentives and protection. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Title V also excludes persons who received shares pursuant to employee compensatory plans in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act from counting against the number of holders of record. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:15 am
by Source: Senator Frank LautenbergSex Offender Research, Recidivism and the Truth [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Endogenous Legal Traditions and Economic Outcomes Posted by Carmine Guerriero, University of Amsterdam, on Friday, April 22, 2016 Tags: Diversity, Efficiency, Financial Regulation, Globalization, International governance, Labor markets, Legal systems,Market efficiency, Social policies, Stakeholders Dieckman v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
SEC and Jarkesy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 2:49 am
Grassley amicus) that Dodd-Frank doesn’t cover “whistleblowers” who never told the SEC [Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:56 am
These bylaw provisions gained notoriety in the recent case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 12:35 am
Frank, 2007 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
The Supreme Court and the Scope of Whistleblowing Anti-retaliation Protections Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, February 23, 2018 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Exchange Act, Misconduct, Rule 21F-2, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, SEC, Securities regulation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts, Whistleblowers Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosures Posted by Kara M. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 9:20 am
Scott, Resisting the Norm of Climate Security Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn, Additional Categories of Agency: ‘Creative Resistors’ to Normative Change in Post-Crisis Global Financial Governance Helen Nesadurai, Contesting Private Sustainability Norms in Primary Commodity Production: Norm Hybridisation in the Palm Oil Sector Frank Harvey & John Mitton, Whose Norm is it Anyway? [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 6:40 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
” SEC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to be protected. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 1:17 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Illegal dissolution of religious organisation: Bryansk-Tula Diocese v Russia" in Law & Religion UK, 6 August 2022, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/08/06/illegal-dissolution-of-religious-organisation-bryansk-tula-diocese-v-russia/ [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:06 am
The SEC voted to propose rules directing the national securities exchanges to adopt listing standards related to a company’s compensation committee, as well as the compensation advisers that these committees retain, as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Section 952. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm
The standard was meant to repeal the agency's sweeping 2004 preemption rules, returning it to the so-called 'Barnett standard' established by the 1996 Supreme Court case of Barnett V. [read post]
