Search for: "Franks v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 4,683
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In York v Frank  2022 NY Slip Op 05738  Decided on October 12, 2022  Appellate Division, Second Department takes the more conservative position, which it does not always do. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Braden, decided today by the Tennessee Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Frank G. [read post]
  For good measure, the complaint throws in a reference to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm by Michael Gordon
  On May 9, 2022, a Fifth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Community Financial Services Association v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Professor Cheng may have over-generalized in stating that judges are epistemically incompetent to make substantive expert determinations. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
  The Final Rules state that the Pay Versus Performance Disclosure will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under either the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) except to the extent that the issuer affirmatively does incorporate it by reference. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:35 pm by Zak Gowen
The Seventh Circuit panel, led by Judge Frank Easterbrook, affirmed Judge Manish Shah’s ruling that plaintiffs failed to state claims under either Section 1 or Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Today, small rural states with less diverse populations benefit from state equality in the Senate. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm by ernst
LaCroix, University of Chicago Law, on James Madison v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
FEC, Disclosure, Political spending, State law, Taxation SEC Bulletin on Conflicts of Interest for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by W. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]