Search for: "G. S. VERSUS T. S." Results 341 - 360 of 529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Paper 5: Greg Lastowka, “Nominative Fair Use Still Doesn't Make Sense” He’s taught nominative fair use a bunch of times, and doesn’t enjoy it because it doesn’t make sense. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm by Arthur Bright
  The HPD's case isn't helped by some of the terminology that was chosen for the Facebook page. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:57 am by paperstreet
PMSI, Inc., No. 8:10-cv-2904-T-23TBM, 2011 WL 1742028 (M.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Gordon Firemark
Warner is arguing that royalties aren’t due Gervash because the first 1936 agreement governs the case, which according to Warner means Whiting’s lineal descendants wouldn’t receive the now litigated royalty payments from Whiting’s work. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:24 am by Moshe (Thomas A.) Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.
The first step toward healthier living begins with learning the distinction of truth versus falsehood or perception versus deception. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  In support of proposed Classes 7B, C, and G. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:14 pm by Jay Eng
  FINRA asserted that Goldman’s practices violated NASD Rules 3010 and 2110 and FINRA Rule 2010. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:21 pm by Robert B. Thompson
This doesn’t happen until you have been subject to SEC reporting for at least twelve months, have filed at least one annual report with the SEC (which will occur sometime after 12 months) and had the requisite market capitalization as of the last business day of the company’s most recently completed second quarter. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:37 pm by admin
Perhaps if Petrino had followed Atticus Finch’s example, he wouldn’t be out of a job today. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 6:02 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Specifically, when addressing the government’s legal theory on appeal versus at the district court, Franck’s states that the “[G]overnment made clear that its legal theory in its papers and at various oral arguments that its case was based only on the “original law” of the 1938 statute (i.e., the government’s “per se” theory). [read post]