Search for: "GALL v GALL"
Results 341 - 360
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
Gall, 128 S. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:10 am
As noted here, the Third Circuit a few months ago granted rehearing en banc in US v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:51 am
As the Supreme Court pointed out in Gall v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:44 am
Now the law has changed markedly over the past few years, and perhaps the nail in the coffin of those dreaded, formerly mandatory guidelines, is the Supreme Court's analysis in Gall v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:41 pm
A helpful reader informed me that the Third Circuit yesterday granted rehearing en banc in US v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:15 pm
The Supreme Court later vacated and remanded the case in light of Gall. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
See Gall, 128 S. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
Bailey, 488 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 2007) (decided six months before Gall), and United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:42 pm
In a concurrence to an Eighth Circuit reasonableness opinion in US v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:15 pm
The Sixth Circuit's ruling yesterday to reverse a below-guideline sentence as unreasonable in US v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:26 pm
Gall, 128 S. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:50 am
Monday, in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 7:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:46 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:43 am
Gould argues that Gall is not an abdication of reasonableness review.Mendez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 8:16 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
In a long opinion that thoughtfully seeks to unpack the standards for substantive reasonableness review, a split Sixth Circuit panel in US v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:10 pm
Even among offenders with zero criminal history points, offenders who have never been arrested have the lowest recidivism risk of all.These issues came to mind as I read closely the Sixth Circuit thoughtful work last week in US v. [read post]
