Search for: "GOOGLE INC.,"
Results 341 - 360
of 11,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2023, 7:52 am
The opinion summarizes the allegations: Defendants Twitter, Inc. and its CEO, Elon Musk, violated his First Amendment rights by blocking his Twitter account twice, for a period of seven days each, in February and March 2023. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
You should Google him. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 2:54 am
A trade group funded by Apple and Google has said the companies cannot stop app downloads in a single state. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 2:44 pm
The court distinguished the Google Books case and Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:10 am
The case is between SAS Institute Inc. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:10 am
According to "Google Statistics", New York Public Personnel Law [NYPPL] readers are frequently accessing summaries court decisions and administrative rulings addressing health insurance issues involving active officers and employees of the State as the employer, officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State as the employer and retirees of the State and political subdivisions of the State posted on NYPPL. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:10 am
According to "Google Statistics", New York Public Personnel Law [NYPPL] readers are frequently accessing summaries court decisions and administrative rulings addressing health insurance issues involving active officers and employees of the State as the employer, officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State as the employer and retirees of the State and political subdivisions of the State posted on NYPPL. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Google decision. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Shannon & Wilson, Inc., 564 P.2d 1131 (Wash. 1977). [3] Story v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 11:40 am
D’Agostino’s testimony should be excluded because he only performed a few Google searches to reach his conclusions. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
BONUS 2: Barz Adventures Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:58 pm
SOTI Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
He alleged that Michael Mitrakos had filed a false DMCA takedown notice with Google. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
The law of some states seems to reject this theory, see, e.g., Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:53 am
And I offer a brief, nostalgic requiem for Toshiba, which is being broken up for scrap by what’s left of Japan Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:35 pm
And I offer a brief, nostalgic requiem for Toshiba, which is being broken up for scrap by what's left of Japan Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Bard, for instance, includes under the prompt box, "Bard may display inaccurate or offensive information that doesn't represent Google's views. [read post]
