Search for: "GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al" Results 341 - 360 of 463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Don Cruse
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
By transferring the NFT between wallets, the NFT holders were able to remove the public listing and avoid the fee associated with its cancellation. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm by Business Law Post
However, in January 2010, the constitutionality of Section 203 was challenged by the Harvard Professor Guhan Subramanian et al. in his paper “Is Delaware’s Antitakeover Statute Unconstitutional? [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Merrill et al., Eds., A Patent System for the 21st Century (National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004), pp. 25-27.What Merrill et al. said on pages 25-27 is a bit different. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:51 pm by Anna Gelpern
 There was a related exchange between Boies and the court on whether the old and the new contracts were effectively linked through the pari passu clause, or totally independent (Boies), and whether paying the Exchange Bondholders without also paying NML et al. would amont to granting new debt priority over old debt. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:52 am by Marie Louise
Microsoft Corporation et al (Patent Arcade) InterDigital – InterDigital files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Wireless Devices With 3G Capabilities (ITC 337 Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) LG – LG files new complaint with ITC over Certain Light Emitting Diodes and Products Containing the Same (ITC 337 Update) Lodsys – What does the Angry Birds lawsuit say about the patent system? [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:24 pm by Marie Louise
HIS (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) ivi – Web site that rebroadcasts TV should be allowed to operate, groups tell NY court : WPIX et al v ivi (Public Knowledge) Mick Haig Productions – Copyright troll gives up in porn-downloading case (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Plagiarism Today) Perfect 10 – Megaupload targeted in multi-million dollar lawsuit (TorrentFreak) Sony – Sony granted temporary restraining… [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:13 am
ITC et al (CAFC 2010-1176) precedential; Judges Lourie, Linn (author), and Dyk A. [read post]